This tool applies findings from the published online dating research literature to evaluate the characteristics of your dating profile. It is built on two primary sources. The first is Finkel, Eastwick, Karney, Reis, and Sprecher’s (2012) comprehensive critical review of online dating, published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, which synthesized what the evidence showed about profile construction, matching algorithms, and communication. The second is Bruch and Newman’s (2018) analysis of 186,000 user messaging behaviors across four U.S. cities, published in Science Advances, which identified the profile and messaging characteristics statistically associated with differential response rates.
The diagnostic evaluates photo count, photo quality, contextual imagery, bio length, bio specificity, opening message strategy, and whether you have received external feedback on your profile. For each element, it returns what the research literature indicates about that characteristic — not a prescription for what you should do.
This is a diagnostic, not a coaching tool. It describes what the published data shows about which profile elements are associated with higher match and response rates. What you choose to do with that information is your own decision.
Analytical diagnostic — not prescriptive advice. This tool applies findings from the online dating research literature (Finkel et al., 2012; Bruch & Newman, 2018) to evaluate profile characteristics associated with differential response rates. It does not constitute personal advice.
Profile diagnostic results
Based on: Finkel EJ et al. Online dating: A critical analysis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2012;13(1):3–66. Bruch EE, Newman MEJ. Aspirational pursuit of mates. Science Advances. 2018;4(8):eaap9815.